Ideologies of hitler and stalin

The Nazi Holocaust is still considered the most horrific tragedy in European history. Both governments were highly concerned over low fertility rates in their respective populations, and applied extensive and intrusive social engineering techniques to increase the number of births.

According to Hitler, Soviet progress had occurred in spite of, not because of Stalin. The Nazis aimed to eliminate their real or imagined political opponents, first in the Reich and later in the occupied territories during the war.

This speech helped to further his cause by gaining support from the people, and by justifying why Trotsky was not the choice for leader. Totalitarianism can only exist after the creation of modern technology, because such technology is essential for propagandafor surveillance of the population, and for the operation of a secret police.

Gentlemen, not you who will be the ones that deliver the verdict over us, but that verdict will be given by the eternal judgement of history, which will speak out against the accusation that has been made against us That such a mentality [racial purity] may be possible cannot be denied in a world where hundreds and thousands accept the principle of celibacy from their own choice, without being obliged or pledged to do so by anything except an ecclesiastical precept.

Stalinism had an ideology which existed independently of Stalin. Stalinism and Nazism Compared, editors Michael Geyer and Sheila Fitzpatrick disputed the concept of totalitarianism, noting that the term entered political discourse first as a term of self-description by the Italian Fascists and was only later used as a framework to compare Nazi Germany with the Soviet Union.

This type of petty crime became very widespread, and was often punished as if it were intentional sabotage motivated by political opposition to the USSR. Friedrich and Brzezinski explicitly reject the claim that the Party, or any other institution, could provide a significant counterweight to the power of the dictator in Nazism or Stalinism.

With Hitler and Stalin being such amoral people and willing to do anything, they would do what they could to benefit their countries.

This depends in part on the personal character of different leaders, but Friedrich and Brzezinski believe that there is also an underlying political cycle, in which rising discontent leads to increased repression up to the point at which the opposition is eliminated, then controls are relaxed until the next time that popular dissatisfaction begins to grow.

The fourth and largest category consisted of ethnic groups that were subject to deportation, famine, or arbitrary arrests under the suspicion of being collectively disloyal to Stalin or to the Soviet state. However, the Bavarian authorities ordered the police to stand their ground.

To reference this page, use the following citation: The totalitarian leader does not rise to power by personally using violence or through any special organizational skills, but rather by controlling appointments of personnel within the party, so that all other prominent party members owe their positions to him.

This included the Holodomor famine directed at the Ukrainiansthe deportation of ethnic groups suspected of pro-German sympathies such as the Volga Germansthe Crimean Tatarsthe Chechens and othersand eventually also persecution of ethnic Jewsespecially as Stalin grew increasingly antisemitic near the end of his life.

By January they had swelled to— most of them non-Germans accused of plotting against the Reich. As laid out in Generalplan Ostthe Nazis wished to eliminate most of the Slavic populations of Eastern Europe, partly through deportation and partly through murder, in order to secure land for ethnic German settlement and colonization.

Both governments were highly concerned over low fertility rates in their respective populations, and applied extensive and intrusive social engineering techniques to increase the number of births. Rather, they strictly tested potential members, in a manner similar to exclusive clubs, and often engaged in political purges of the membership, expelling large numbers of people from their ranks and sometimes arresting and executing those expelled, such as in the Great Purge or the Night of the Long Knives.

According to Friedrich and Brzezinski, the most effective terror is invisible to the people it affects. Stalin was telling people what they wanted to hear and he used this speech to further his cause.

In Stalinism, there was a gulf between ideology and reality when it came to violence. This demonstrates to us that Hitler aspired to make Germany strong and feared.

The Hitler-Stalin Pact

According to Arendt, totalitarian governments must be constantly fighting enemies in order to survive. Stalinism and Nazism Compared, editors Michael Geyer and Sheila Fitzpatrick disputed the concept of totalitarianism, noting that the term entered political discourse first as a term of self-description by the Italian Fascists and was only later used as a framework to compare Nazi Germany with the Soviet Union.

In this report Hitler argued for a "rational anti-Semitism" which would not resort to pogromsbut instead "legally fight and remove the privileges enjoyed by the Jews as opposed to other foreigners living among us.

This confusion produced competition between Nazi officials, as each of them attempted to prove that he was a more dedicated Nazi than his rivals, by engaging in ever more extreme policies.

And both countries had expansionist foreign policies with a particular interest in Central and Eastern Europe. Both men hoped to buy time to prepare for the future Nazi-Soviet war they knew was inevitable.

Everywhere we find the presence of those germs which give rise to protuberant growths that must sooner or later bring about the ruin of our culture. Its final goal, however, must be the irrevocable removal of the Jews themselves. European imperialism of the nineteenth century also paved the way for totalitarianism, by legitimizing the concept of endless expansion.

A number of authors have carried out comparisons of Nazism and Stalinism, in which they have considered the similarities and differences of the two ideologies and political systems, what relationship existed between the two regimes, and why both of them came to prominence at the same elonghornsales.com the 20th century, the comparison of Stalinism and Nazism was made on the topics of totalitarianism.

Stalin vs. Hitler If two men were to be tagged with having the most impact, good or bad, on twentieth century Europe the names Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler would ring loud and clear. Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were the most recognizable and known totalitarian leaders in Europe.

Comparing Hitler and Stalin In Their Rise To Power

Contemporary History Hitler Vs Stalin essay January 26, Hitler Vs. Stalin Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar.

These two despots were the most famous and probably the bloodiest dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another. What role did ideology play in Stalin’s rise to power? L/O – To identify the significance of ideology in Stalin’s rise to power.

Key Questions for this Section. How did ideology help Stalin achieve power? Was Stalin’s ideology a continuation of the ideology established by Marx and Lenin or a complete change?

Hitler and Stalin: Different Men with Similar Ideologies Essay Words | 6 Pages Hitler and Stalin: Different Men with Similar Ideologies Both Hitler and Stalin were influential men in regards to how they shaped the Eastern world with their views on leadership and individuals.

Hitler and Stalin: Different Men with Similar Ideologies Both Hitler and Stalin were influential men in regards to how they shaped the Eastern world with their views on leadership and individuals.

Ideologies of hitler and stalin
Rated 0/5 based on 46 review
Political views of Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia